The following video is Part 2 to my previous post and I think most of the inconsistencies are covered in these two videos. There are minor contradictions not included in the videos, but they are very small in comparison to what is shown. This was a group effort and I wish to thank everyone who contributed pieces of information in order to help more people understand the obvious inconsistencies in the Rick Dyer story. Those who believe this is a hoax are not haters, they are not troublemakers, and YES, most of them do think Bigfoot roam the forests of North America. Critical thinking and logic are not crimes. Do not let anyone tell you differently.
After Daz and I did our live book review of 'I Shot Bigfoot', there were some supporters of Rick who had some issues with the review. The biggest arguing point was where actually had his "first sighting". I honestly don't know why this was such an issue. Rick has always maintained he saw a Bigfoot behind The Home Depot. It's interesting to note that not a single supporter disputed any other "facts" in the Dyer story. One person went so far as to ask for video evidence of the inconsistencies in Rick's verbal account versus the book story, versus the documentary story. Ask and ye shall receive. Many people have already seen the light after the documentary did not show what Dyer said it would. There wasn't 3 minutes of clear HD footage of a Bigfoot as Rick said there would be. Dyer tried to dismiss this as being out of his control and then poked his supporters with a stick afterwards by saying he was sorry the Bigfoot didn't do a "song and dance" for them. Rick has always enjoyed telling people he changes his story to throw people off. Throw people off of what? Changing the description of "Hank" really isn't such a big secret that it warrants altering. The same goes for other information Rick has "leaked" out.
"We discussed last night about doing a Book review, today. Me and Sasquai, I have not done any big research or set up a plan for this, just going to wing it on my part and hopefully show several inconsistancies that was either not mentioned or over looked. It is my belief by doing this it may open some eyes to a few things, generate some debate and also allow for future inconsistancies to be seen. There are many out there and if we over look one or between the two of us miss something, we can always come back and discuss it here. I have no plans in reading the book to anyone or going over in detail anything specific about the parties involved in the book. I will tell you this up front, David did a fine job putting it on paper, I think if he had a little more background in Bigfoot he would of had more opportunities to ask some questions. As a book goes if I had no knowledge of any of this, I would think of it as a good read, but soon as i visited the website of the person the book is about i would immidiately see it for what it is."
This is the result of our review of Rick's story. The goal was not to review the book itself, the purpose was to point out inconsistencies in the story as told by Rick Dyer.It would be virtually impossible for Dyer to refute any of this because the words come directly from Rick Dyer himself. We stuck exclusively with facts.
I just finished reading Rick's booklet 'I Shot Bigfoot'. Rick talks about his childhood and growing up. He also mentions his love of cars, and speaks very highly of his mother. This is the very first time I have ever heard of Rick talk about his family, especially his mom, so I did find that part of the book interesting. It's plainly obvious Dyer loves his wife and kids, even a hoaxer has a heart. I had a few problems with the narrative however. Rick's use of God was over the top and had that T.V. evangelist air about it in his story telling.
“God, please help me…please let Morgan see a Bigfoot…please let something happen…anything.”
The transportation of the body left me somewhat perplexed. On past radio shows Rick mentioned on more than one occasion that "authorities" came directly to the "kill" site because the Brits were worried about getting in trouble. Rick also said samples were taken from the body on site. This is excluded in the book and I don't know why. Apparently tissue and hair samples were obtained in Las Vegas. This is yet another example of the story changing. I also have issue with Rick's claims about the refer truck and long term storage of the body.
"so we spent an anxious night watching a Bigfoot thaw, hoping he would make it to the next morning."
I am familiar with reefer trucks and I am not aware of any reefer truck that would freeze a 600 lb. + body, even if a bulkhead door was used. Trucks of this kind are designed to keep frozen goods from thawing,they are not designed to actually freeze goods.
The book talks about the experiences of Musky Allen, and there is a glaring discrepancy with the description of "Hank". Most of us have read Musky's account of what happened, and his description of the body. We have also seen at least four different artist's interpretations of the facial features. Musky gave very detailed descriptions of the face but at no point in time, past or present, did Allen ever mention "slits" on each side of the nose. A prominent feature such as this would be very difficult to miss or omit when describing the face of a dead Bigfoot. Dyer, in his own words said the beast had slits or extra nostrils on it's face. This can not be disputed or retracted because Rick has said it more than a few times. Once again, why is such an important facial feature left out by one person, and described in detail by another. Why did Rick omit this from the booklet? The rest of the book talks about haters and how Rick is the best Bigfoot Tracker in the world. That's also a contradiction because by Dyer's own admission he does not track. The narrative jumps around a bit but is presented in a timeline that's not difficult to follow.
If you're a fan of Rick Dyer, the book will not reveal anything you have already been told. If you think this is a hoax, the book is a fun read to find the contradictions. Is the booklet worth $4.99? I think you know my answer to that question.
Rick has been busy having a membership drive lately but that all comes to an end soon. In fact, membership ends today....except there is no date shown. Is this like the perpetual "Going Out of Business" sales that are frequently seen, yet the business never shut down?
What does a Gold Member get for their hard earned $99.99? For that price I bet it's super sweet stuff us regular folk will never get to see.
Exclusive membership has it's rewards people and here is a taste of what you get:
**Video is used for discussion purposes. All copyrights belong to the copyright holder(s)**
This is riveting. Mind blowing. No, wait....it's just Rick in some random bathroom with a set of plastic baby keys. Rick is probably recording the video from the bathroom of McDonald's, located at the nearest Wal-Mart. Maybe HE is at Chucky Cheese for all I know.
I can only guess what Platinum membership buys you. Perhaps a video of the entire bathroom recorded in HD that is three minutes long?
Silver membership gives you no advantages, much like the Gold membership.
So when did this little conversation take place? Do you have screen shots indicating that "visual aids" came from pinkfoot along with the conversation?
In the interest of fairness, and the very polite requests, I have obtained the screen shots.
We can see the font is correct and the blue font is correct. So, was this lengthy conversation photoshopped? I like to use a program called FotoForensics to help me see if a photo has been manipulated. I decided to run three of the screen grabs through the program and I left three for anyone to try for themselves.
I don't see anything unusual with the screen grabs and it appears to be unaltered. This is what a photoshopped picture will look like:
Notice the white rectangles. Those are books that have been added to the original image. The dinosaur has been added as well. In the screen grabs you will see the same fuzzy white areas where text and text bubbles have been added. This is an example of a photoshopped conersation:
You can clearly see the exact same white snowy areas where the text is. Here is the fake conversation beside the Jas/Pinkfoot conversation. Jas/Pink are on the left and fake is on the right.
These two images are night and day from each other. The colour of the text on the left matches that of the rest of the image. The colour of the text on the right does not. Don't take my word for it, try it yourselves. Apparently Rick got wind of what was said about Pinkfoot's conversation and Rick replied with a very short rebuttal. He doesn't call Jas a liar and he doesn't defend Pinkfoot. I have to wonder why. Rick tried to be clever and he posted a "conversation" with Jas showing how easily things can be faked. He did a bang up job, because his fake is easy to spot.
I don't have to run this one through photo forensics because it's obvious the font is wrong and the message exceeds it's boundaries.
Tonight has proven to be an interesting and eye opening evening. I have learned more about the Rick Dyer hoax in one hour than I have in one month. It's no surprise to most of us that Dyer has lost followers (Rick's term). "Followers" sounds too cult-like for my tastes. Most of his fans left because the documentary 'Shooting Bigfoot' did not live up to the hype Rick generated. He firmly set the hook and kept it there for over a month. People are waking up and seeing the light and Rick continues to dismiss these people as "trouble makers". All I can say is "Welcome to the light" to those who now realize Rick is pulling their legs. Are there people still on Rick's team who think he's pulling a fast one? I'll bet here are, but what about those very close to Dyer? For a long time the idea was floated around that Rick had staged the tent video using CGI, but I couldn't accept that idea because of the cost involved. The green screen idea was a popular idea and one I could see as being plausible. It's no secret Freezer Boy has used a green screen more than once. This video is an example of Rick using one:
The video isn't perfect, but a little practice and better software can make all the difference. Apparently the Vice President of Bigfoottracker.com also thinks the green screen theory is a valid one.
Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer I think he shot it and has a body, but I also think Rick was greedy and wanted revenge on BF community and went back to SA (fact) and filmed a reinactment of the BF that came to his camp and released it to US media, before Minnow got wind of it. Have you seen a guy named Bigz that works for Dyer? His facial features look just like Hank ... • 05:57 Jas Smith No i havent • 05:57 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer notice the green background used in cgi? • 05:57 Jas Smith That would come out though when he releases the body Pink. Are you mad at the thought he could have done this ? cant quite see it is there an original somewhere ? • 05:58 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer how can I be mad at someone who is mad? lol • 05:59 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer this is all i have • 05:59 Jas Smith oh never thought about it like that hehe can just about see it, i guess there are similarities now you mention it, but would he really go to all that trouble ? i mean green screen ? Rick ? does he even know what green screen is ? • 06:00 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer yes, but Rick will be very wealthy when body is released, it is worth mega millions! he could move back to Mexico where Lily is from and never be bothered • 06:01 Jas Smith i consider myself quite techy but i wouldnt have a clue where to start • 06:01 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer lol, yes. he has a green screen in his video chats you can see it in the back corner of his room in the old house
Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer lol, yes. he has a green screen in his video chats you can see it in the back corner of his room in the old house • 06:02 Jas Smith yeah i saw that • 06:02 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer Rick had a film company called LION FILMS ... <=== LOL! • 06:03 Jas Smith LION as in LYING ? Sorry my cryptic mind is kicking in • 06:03 Pinkfoot Cindy Schall Shafer thats what i am thinking! he even had a film called" Making Money from Hoaxing"
I also have a visual aid that accompanied the text from Ms. Pinkfoot.
I realize the pictures are blurry and that's too bad because I was hoping to see if there is any resemblance to Bigz and Hank. The point of the photos is that they were put together not by me, but by Pinkfoot. If the Vice President of Dyer's "organization" has serious doubts, why is she VP? Why is she playing this up for Rick? Is there some back room hand shaking going on? I would urge people to refrain from purchasing any memberships until Rick Dyer produces something worthy of such a hefty price tag. If you feel you have been ripped off, file a charge back with your credit card company. This is only the tip of the iceberg folks. I'm almost willing to bet this hoax doesn't survive until August 15, 2013.
Does Pinkfoot still think the green screen theory is likely?
Decide for yourselves. The answer is right in front of you.
Rick Dyer is back telling lies about people again. Not long ago, freezer boy said he was leaving the Bigfoot community ( he was never part of), then he said he was going to avoid all the negativity that is bringing him down. For a guy who wants to lay low, he's doing a piss poor job. Last week Dyer attacked Liam Gray in this post, which was a complete lie. Later....much later, Rick posted a lame ass retraction. He couldn't admit he lied and made up a name 'Gary Parker' and then said he at least posted 1% truth. Dyer wouldn't know 1% truth if it walked up and kicked him in the nuts. The guy doesn't know "truth" as regular normal human beings know the word.
According to Dyer's rationale, I could call him a pedophile because he has children. I know, it sounds really stupid, doesn't it?
Last night someone took a wrecking ball to Rick's Team Tracker site (he doesn't really track). I missed all of this but I found a post at Bigfoot Evidence. I'll repost the photos here because they make me happy. If you haven't read the story, visit Shawn's blog for the details.
Rick wasn't too happy about his nice looking site that someone else designed for free being demolished, so Rick did what he does best....he makes up a hit piece without any verification whatsoever. He says Jas Smith, Shawn Evidence and ZenYeti were responsible for the hack. He accuses Shawn of paying Jas to trash bigfoottracker.com, but the truth is Jas Smith had a password for the site. I don't know if Jas actually did this, but that seems to be the story floating around. I personally have not confirmed if Jas was involved or not. If it was in fact Jas, and he had the password, WHY would Shawn or ZenYeti need to bribe him? Dyer even uses one of Jas' creations in the fabricated post.
Later on freezer boy makes a video saying his site wasn't hacked. If Dyer removes the video, I have a back up.
Is Rick suffering from short term memory loss or does he have an evil twin. More than likely, he just makes things up as he goes along. Much like his dead bigfoot in a secret facility that somehow defies decomposition.
Dyer has attacked everyone without providing evidence to support his claims.....much like his dead bigfoot story. He is now attacking the people who supported him. Why did they fall from grace of the illustrious cult leader? They asked questions and they questioned the story Rick gave. Because of this they were "trouble makers". Trouble makers? I thought asking rational questions made one a "hater". Yessiree, Dyer don't need no pesky people making other folks think for themselves now, do he? Rick doesn't care who he throws under the bus and nobody is immune....nobody. If there are any former supporters who would like their voice heard, feel free to send me an email or message me on Facebook.
Remember the person Rick said made the post about Liam Gray? Gary Parker is what Dyer wrote. The name seemed very familiar to me. I have not read any recent posts by a Gary Parker on Dyer's blog, FB/FB or anywhere else. The only Gary Parker I am familiar is none other than Matt Whitton. Perhaps Rick thinks I have short term memory loss as well.
I usually check Rick's blog at least once during the day to see if anything new is happening. After the documentary fiasco, things went kind of quiet. Most of us already know when Rick Dyer is backed in to a corner, he comes out swinging. While he is busy cussing in front of his children and throwing out false accusations to all who will listen, the people he is telling lies about simply ignore it for the most part. Freezer Boy, or one of members with access to his blog crossed the line yesterday. Rick attempted to shine a bad light on Zen Yeti, a popular Facebook page because Dyer's previous attacks on Michael Merchant have been ignored for the simple fact that Rick's stories are all lies. Dyer always says he has 100% proof of his lies but he never provides supporting links. That should raise red flags right there folks. Yesterday Dyer posted on his blog telling a complete lie about a Zen Yeti fan, Liam Gray. I read the post last night and thought it was quite pathetic and highly unbelievable. Apparently Mr. Gray saw Rick's blog post and he was, and probably still is, furious. This is what Liam had to say:
I am currently on the phone to my lawyer. I will be taking Rick Dyer to court for Defamation. He has not only published my likeness and account information without my consent he is also spreading viscous and untrue rumors about me. I would appreciate people's help in clearing my name and reputation online when possible. I have never engaged in sexual conduct with an animal, nor necrophilia, and I have not been convicted for these crimes as this article claims. If nothing else, please let this be an example of the character and integrity of this man.
This is the post that made Liam Gray furious:
“A man faces a charge of animal cruelty, accused of neighbor performing a sex act with a or’s dog. Liam Gray, was booked into Jail on Friday afternoon on a misdemeanor charge of simple animal cruelty. He was released Saturday night on a $5,140 bond. Witnesses told police they saw Gray being ‘unusually affectionate’ with the dog and saw pictures on Gray's computer of him having sex with the animal. Gray was arrested Friday at his apartment . Officers also seized Gray’s computer for examination at the district attorney’s office. ‘We just assisted in the case because he had a warrant for animal cruelty,’ police spokesman Jim Taliaferro said. ‘The computer may have possessed some pornography. We turned it all over to the city.’ The charge of animal cruelty carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and up to six months in jail.” In the comments to the first story to follow Bestiality Week, reader Sven noted that he was “bored of all the ‘So, bestiality is pretty common.’ updates” here on PervScan. It was a more interesting comment than it might even seem on the surface, since it connects precisely to the cycle of boredom and novelty that underlies perversion itself. In its books Extraterrestrial Sex Fetish and Necrophilia Variations, Supervert has referred to this as the Law of Diminishing Kicks. Simply put, it means that once you get used to a certain perversity — bestiality, say — it provides diminishing returns, lesser kicks, and therefore it pushes you to explore weirder and weirder kinks in an effort to maintain the intensity of your pleasures.
I can't say that I blame Mr. Gray for being upset, I know I would be thoroughly pissed off if shit for brains told lies about me.....actually, Rick has told lies about me, but not to this degree. As you can see from the above photos, Dyer's mindless post full of bullshit and lies was posted on the Stunned Wonder's blog. What Dyer always seems to forget is people do their homework. They investigate, they analyze, and THEN they decide what is factual and what is utter horse shit. In this case, we have another example of a complete falsehood. Freezer Boy's post was intentionally altered in order to attack and defame Mr. Gray. A few astute friends did some digging and found the real story....a story from March, 2006.
Nitwit even quoted PervScan. Need another link? BAM!
“A Shreveport man faces a charge of animal cruelty, accused of performing a sex act with a neighbor’s dog. David Bruce Powell, 57, was booked into the Caddo Correctional Center on Friday afternoon on a misdemeanor charge of simple animal cruelty. He was released Saturday night on a $5,140 bond. Witnesses told police they saw Powell being ‘unusually affectionate’ with the dog and saw pictures on Powell’s computer of him having sex with the animal. Powell was arrested Friday at his apartment on the 900 block of Louisiana Avenue in downtown Shreveport. Officers also seized Powell’s computer for examination at the Caddo Parish district attorney’s office. ‘We just assisted in the case because he had a warrant for animal cruelty,’ Shreveport police spokesman Jim Taliaferro said. ‘The computer may have possessed some pornography. We turned it all over to Caddo Parish.’ The charge of animal cruelty carries a maximum penalty of a $1,000 fine and up to six months in jail.” — Shreveport Times (US) In the comments to the first story to follow Bestiality Week, reader Sven noted that he was “bored of all the ‘So, bestiality is pretty common.’ updates” here on PervScan. It was a more interesting comment than it might even seem on the surface, since it connects precisely to the cycle of boredom and novelty that underlies perversion itself. In its books Extraterrestrial Sex Fetish and Necrophilia Variations, Supervert has referred to this as the Law of Diminishing Kicks. Simply put, it means that once you get used to a certain perversity — bestiality, say — it provides diminishing returns, lesser kicks, and therefore it pushes you to explore weirder and weirder kinks in an effort to maintain the intensity of your pleasures.
As you can plainly see, Rick Dyer will go out of his way to attack and fabricate stories about anyone who may disagree with him. He somehow feels he is untouchable. I hope Liam Gray sues Rick Dyer for every last penny of his used car empire.
